I can't talk about the actual article because I'm no longer a student with access to the online periodicals, and don't really want to pay the $35 to download the pdf. I'm also going to now resist the very strong temptation to digress into a rant about the cost of online journals and get on to the images. At least I have the captions!
"Multiple applications of branching logic show the logical symmetry of evolution among organisms and development within them."
In other words... visual trees can be used to demonstrate the evolution of organisms, the diversification of cells within an organism, and the resulting anatomical structures of development.
First, two on evolution and speciation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40671/406719adbdef7186818566d1c6a34b65e3d09c36" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d7c7/9d7c73aee7a1676a75ec1525add0e65c7b8a2d83" alt=""
See the original here. I definitely prefer to look at the aged inky version in Darwin's own pen strokes.
The next two are not about evolution, but rather the divergence of cells within a single organism. The patterns that emerge as cell types diversify are similar to those of species diversification:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22274/222744f15e1c3356efd0ac5f151efc01c9245e93" alt=""
And similarly:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f87d/2f87d6a6a9ad3315a783c60dfbd155f422e920cb" alt=""
Now let's get organismal (is that a word?) and look at branching patterns found in anatomy:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a9ed/9a9ed747c25804868fa97f740877767071858250" alt=""
And one from the world of botany:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5e95/b5e951b110c5a3649ced3b3ca601dd7a8305677f" alt=""
$35 ... seriously.
2 comments:
Darwin's evolution trees always sort of reminded me of neurons.
Probably because it has multiple branches coming from each point. In modern trees, this is used to indicate when the author is uncertain of which of the two groups is more closely related.
b. in this figure ( http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Essays/phylocode/Fig3.jpeg ) Has an example of that.
Post a Comment